Having followed two bells the many twists around Dieudonne, I can tell you with unwavering faith, t

A general questioning merchants media is at work. Not inherent to their profiteering greed, but how they apply arrogantly the famous saying: "The reason of the strongest is always the best. "
Having followed two bells the many twists around Dieudonne, I can tell you with unwavering faith, that since 2001, freedom of expression is in the process of taking a beating. Robocops the big guys, leather two bells metal boots, there are the big heads robocops heel who stalk evil in the minds of ordinary people.
From the time it was passed, it was well drawn boundaries, white line that must not be crossed two bells unless we made amends by promising that not do it again. But beware of recurrence! For Dieudonné, it was the loss of points and forfeiture of the license to laugh.
Even more innovative, we just establish de facto municipal passes for artists. And guess who was entitled to the first: Dieudonné. Sacred Dieudo, always ahead of a bus!
Look Stéphane Guillon. He made a joke about Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who complained to the antenna, then Sarkozy and, at a stroke, it was publicized that excessive Stéphane Guillon could be ousted from France-Inter . As this information has been widely disseminated, comedian claimed victory, arguing that this broad dissemination guarantees its independence. The truth is that in reality, he was shown the limits not to cross. The edge of the white line is the attack on the privacy of the powerful. Stéphane Guillon therefore knows he can not repeat that line and brushing it with great care. He knows he can never go beyond, for example by addressing ideological or community topics. He will complain surely not seen the tremendous publicity stunt that was the story.
Francis Lalanne wrote a little book in which he denounced the excesses of presidentialization the country and questioned the republic. In a few sentences, it sets the scene for his book. The French Republic is really governed by the people for the people? Or is it just a good excuse for the personal power of a single or a group as in the time of Napoleon?
Eric Zemmour showed great condescension vis-à-vis Lalanne he sees primarily as a popular singer: beautiful voice, good looks, nice words but little brain. two bells That's right, Zemmour revealed his true face in entering and closing two bells the debate. One more time.
Zemmour is a fake Democrat, a Republican who believes that the false issue of power concentrated in the hands of one man was decided by the story three times: during the takeover of De Gaulle in 1958, when the constitution of the Fifth Republic in 1962, at the election of Pompidou in 1969, there is no point for him to return it.
He likes to claim history, Zemmour. Yet he believes that in terms of constitutional rights, the die is cast, forgetting that a particular historical context had brought De Gaulle to power: decolonization of Algeria war, cold war, France into NATO.
When we look closely, we see that the most successful democracies are those in which the head of state has very few powers: Germany, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Italy, Austria. Everything is governed by the majority leader in parliament, a parliament that has a right to control everything about the state of up and decide whether or not the use of the army.
But while the point was interesting and showed a real abuse of power vis-à-vis the French people, who had voted against a sovereign European constitution by referendum, Eric Zemmour swept theory of Francis Lalanne of hand .
But without doubt the pedants, Francis Lalanne is primarily a popular singer for women in their forties who should be confined to his art. He is forbidden to have a responsible approach and mingle high politics!
It is very significant to the current atmosphere. There is an atmosphere of gentle two bells rebellion that is taking root in France as people increasingly many feel ridiculed. Steps of civil disobedience without violence are doing the accession of many left behind.
The people need to express his disappointment if his anger. He chose very creative forms unprecedented action, against two bells which the police two bells may exercise violence without going to a brutal and arbitrary two bells police. The proof these days with reports of the Committee two bells on Security Ethics showing that the

MORE